A-Line Magazine

View Original

Influence or Interference?

  Freedom of speech. This power roars loud and clear throughout America, cherished as one of the most fundamental rights. Forming opinions is innately engraved into the human mind and, because this is an era of technology and innovation, information is constantly in the air. Whether it be gossip, facts, or speculation, opinions can only be developed with information. Information that is gathered, analyzed, and evaluated to determine its relevance to one’s opinion. Yet, this process is seemingly ignored with the rise in social media. Despite the privilege, many find themselves surrendering their capacity for independent thought. Instead of grappling with issues personally, countless people look to celebrities to shape their perspectives, effectively trading their critical thinking for the convenience of someone else’s views. 

The influence of celebrities has never been more potent. Thanks to social media, their voices reach audiences instantly and constantly.  They can sway millions with a single post and for many of their followers, especially younger ones, these opinions are taken at face value. Whether it’s an endorsement for a cause or an opinion on a political issue, celebrities possess a unique ability to shape narratives, often without their followers questioning the depth or accuracy of their words. This does not always have negative connotations; some celebrities positively use their platforms to spread accurate information, like Leonardo DiCaprio, whose advocacy for environmentalism has been turned into a mainstream movement.

Celebrity platforms are a double-edged sword, however, which is clear now more than ever. While some celebrities use their platforms to raise awareness on worthy causes, others wade into more dangerous waters. The moment they step outside their expertise, their words hold very little value. Yet these words still have the power to imprint on millions. 

During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the world witnessed the significant harm that can arise from misinformed celebrities sharing their hot takes. Prominent figures like Tomi Lahren questioned the safety of vaccines, while Madonna spread unverified claims about the virus being a “great equalizer”. These statements triggered not just small ripples, but a tidal wave of misinformation, often leaving medical professionals scrambling to correct the record and clarify the science behind public health recommendations.

The problem is, when a celebrity speaks, their voice echoes. And while it is true that these celebrities have the privilege to speak their minds just like everyone else, they need to learn to be more mindful. Their influence amplifies the impact of their words, turning opinions into what some fans perceive as facts. The question isn’t whether they have a right to speak; it’s whether their leverage over public opinion is helpful or harmful.

Celebrity influence is most dangerous when it spreads misinformation, intentionally or not, and nowhere is this more evident than in the realm of politics. As the upcoming presidential election draws near, famous figures from all sides of the political spectrum are voicing their opinions on everything from healthcare to climate policy. Some celebrities use their platforms responsibly, urging their followers to get involved, to research, to vote. Others, however, let misinformation slip through the cracks. Their opinions are broadcasted to millions of followers, spreading faster than the facts and turning half-truths into accepted realities. Celebrities may not be the original source of these claims, but their status gives the misinformation a credibility it wouldn’t otherwise have. 

“With great power comes great responsibility.” This principle takes on a unique problem when it comes to celebrities and their freedom of speech. There’s a growing belief that celebrities have a moral obligation to wield their influence carefully. Fans often view these figures not just as entertainers, but as role models and trusted sources. This perception places a heavy burden on celebrities to communicate thoughtfully. In an age where misinformation is so prevalent, they should recognize that their platforms come with a duty to inform rather than mislead. Nevertheless, the line between personal expression and public responsibility is a blur. While everyone is entitled to share their views, the stakes are particularly high for those whose words can reach millions. When it comes to celebrities spreading information, the potential for harm is ever-present. Ultimately, celebrities must recognize the power of their voice and the responsibility that accompanies it.

As society grapples with the profound impact of celebrity influence, fostering a culture of critical thinking and independent thought becomes increasingly vital. The allure of fame often simplifies complex issues, allowing voices to rise without the scrutiny that should follow. Individuals must reclaim their autonomy in shaping their beliefs, resisting the urge to accept popular opinion as truth. People have the freedom to speak, but what good is that when the words aren’t even theirs?


Written by Isana Mehta, Design: Alyssa Lazarchik, Social Media: Bella Hanson